The University of Rochester is a mostly trans-friendly campus. I hope that others agree. With an inclusive student body, faculty training, gender-neutral bathrooms, and health insurance that covers hormone treatment, I found it comfortable to transition on campus. 

And yet, there is a curious blindspot: repeated usage of deadnames where a preferred name is sufficient. While a preferred name change process officially exists in UR Student, it seems that other departments’ systems lack access to these details. Glaring examples include public mailing lists, the mail center, the International Student Office (ISO), the library, and the Computer Science undergraduate (CSUG) machines. 

For many transgender individuals, our chosen names hold dear meaning in juxtaposition with the unfortunately gendered subtext of our legal names. It matters to us that we can forget about our legal names in all but necessary legal situations, until the difficult legal name change process is complete. A process, mind you, that may be impossible for some international students. 

While I found it mildly infuriating to be deadnamed in an email written to the University community and external sponsors with probably hundreds of readers or more, others may find it more stressful, even potentially outing them without consent. 

If UR implemented a policy of utilizing preferred names wherever legal names are not necessary, it would improve the quality of life of transgender students, with no downsides for others.

Tagged: LGBTQ rights trans


Christmas has gone too far

People should look to other cultures to learn the truth of the cliche that holidays are about more than just gifts. 

We must keep fighting, and we will

While those with power myopically fret about the volume of speech and the health of grass, so many instead turn their attention to lives of hundreds of thousands of human beings.

Masked protesters disrupt Boar’s Head, protest charges against students

Protesters gathered in front of the Highe Table and urged the University to drop the criminal charges against the four students recently charged with second-degree criminal mischief, saying that the University’s response is disproportionate compared to other bias-related incident reports.